Rated 3 von
5
von
nbm757 aus
Comfortable pants, but too baggy and long
comfortable and breathe well while biking. Look decent around the office. Pants are way too baggy and the selection of waist and length combinations is bizarre. The fact that I can't find a 30 inch length mixed with a 32 or a 34 waist is annoying. The 32 inch length has been way too long but I've been able to make it work by rolling the pant leg up slightly.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-08-16
Rated 5 von
5
von
Rowrider aus
The Best or nothing
The latest edition of these trousers is a significant improvement over the former one, already very good. The fabrics now have more stretch and the pockets are improved. Particularly cool is the side pocket which elegantly stores the phone in a convenient place for cycling. Always impressive how this resists to dirt, how easy it is to clean and how, in this version, the water repelling surface works. Equally impression the reduced packing space of these, making them ideal for travel. Perfect also as comfortable smart casual business outfit. Hence the old Mercedes slogan seems appropriate.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-02-19
Rated 2 von
5
von
GaryM aus
Big disappointment
Very disappointed with these trousers. I have 3 other pairs of technical trousers and this new version is far removed from the previous versions in terms of details, quality and style. Cost cutting is very evident as details such as pockets and material feels cheap. Everything about the new version feels cheap compared to v1, even the small detail like the pink pocket trim is now cut straight rather than to a point in an effort to reduce the cost of the trousers. The trousers are a combination of the technical trousers and trail shorts but with the great features of both removed. This cost cutting is a continuing trend with Rapha products lately, features being removed and cheaper materials seems to be the way things are going. I bought these in the sale and they’re worth the £50 odd I paid, definitely not worth £130. Very disappointing as I’ve been a rapha fan since the 1st classic jersey.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-01-28
Rated 1 von
5
von
mzrkwcz aus
Used to be great but no longer
I was living in those trousers for the last years. But no longer. Cheaper material, worse cut, less sizes, phone zip pocket placed in the visible place, back pockets sewn on the top of the trouser material.
This is not Rapha it is just the logo. This happens in all Rapha products. Pity.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-01-09
Rated 2 von
5
von
SamAmbr aus
Downgraded from the previous version.
I purchased these trousers with the expectation that they would be identical to the Technical Trousers I bought a year ago, but they were completely different and slightly worse.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-03-01
Rated 2 von
5
von
Leftie aus
The wrong trousers
Reflective graphic should be visable on right leg when lifted away from chain.
However located incorrectly on left leg!
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-07-28
Rated 4 von
5
von
uzii aus
Its not like the previous versions, but its okay.
Here are the differences: straight fit, not tapered. Scoop pockets instead of side ones, however, I do prefer side pockets as its easier to access my phone, cards, etc. Press on button closure instead of a button and eyelet. The material has a softer hand feel than the previous which also makes it less susceptible to creases.
I think its still an okay pants, would not shell out for it at full price. And if you miss the taper fit you can get any decent tailor to do it for you (just factor that into the price).
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-01-01
Rated 3 von
5
von
TPN1934 aus
Prefer the Old Style!
Prev version had nicer lining, was a little thicker, and had a different cut altogether. These feel way more lightweight. Also the zips have gone from the pockets which is a massive loss!
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-03-07
Rated 1 von
5
von
Simon555 aus
A backwards step
Bring back the old ones. These are a less good fit and less functional (no zip pockets). There was no need for Rapha to replace the original technical trousers.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-02-21
Rated 3 von
5
von
TPSHANGHAI aus
Too baggy
The fit of these pants isn’t consistent with previous models. They are much more baggy than previous models and didn’t find them suitable for cycling in. Pity because the materials are an upgrade from before. Felt great but too baggy.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-07-07
Rated 2 von
5
von
RPMM aus
QC on the reflective material
QC on the reflective material as its on the wrong leg; left and not right despite the product description indicating it would be on the right side (which makes sense given its the drivetrain side). Disappointed considering the rest of the trousers is solid (material, fit etc).
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-01-09
Rated 1 von
5
von
HongKongWrighty aus
Despec’ed - step backwards
Fit is more casual, cheaper fabric + less sizing options. Really is a backward step from previous iterations
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-02-20
Rated 4 von
5
von
E KJELL aus
Good, but not quite great
Nice quality and good fit. But still not close to the old Randonne pants that had a slimmer cut and looked less hiking/technical...more casual and worked better for the days in the office. But still ok I guess!
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-09-18
Rated 3 von
5
von
Jas66 aus
Comfortable but not great style.
Comfortable, but think the style could improve, specifically the width of the leg opening, which seems too wide and makes me feel like I look like my father-in-law. However, they’re the only pants I brought on the trip I’m currently on, and have worked well for long-haul flights, getting around the city, hanging in the café, and nights out.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-08-04
Rated 2 von
5
von
vmmc aus
New design not as good as previous one.
The new design is quite different and not as slick specially the back pockets.
Still a good pair of pants but the previous design was much better.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-02-12
Rated 3 von
5
von
James 99 aus
A bit disappointing
OK, but not sure they're worth the money. Fabric isn't great. Reflective log is on the inside of the left leg, but it's the right I'm going to roll up to keep clear from chain ring. Not up to expectations. Every other bit of Rapha kit I've got is well put together and thought out, this is not.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-02-04
Rated 5 von
5
von
Mjpred7 aus
Light weight trousers
Great pair of lightweight trousers. Size seems about as expected. Roll up small if travelling
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-06-24
Rated 1 von
5
von
emma brasen aus
Not at all what we expected
The trousers were to broad in the legs, the randonné pants had a much better fit.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-02-20
Rated 3 von
5
von
MMurer aus
Not my style
Did not like the wide cut. Reflective material was inside the wrong leg
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-06-12
Rated 4 von
5
von
Robjj aus
Good pair of trousers for every day use
I bought a pair of these about 18 months ago, the old design with three zipped pockets. They are good, although the fabric is showing signs of wear - the elastic fibers are breaking and poking out. I was going to buy a new pair, but was disappointed to find that the new version only has one zipped pocket and Rapha doesn't make my size anymore (34, 34). It seems that Rapha clothes are only for people of average height now. (The stars are for the old design.)
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-02-26
Rated 4 von
5
von
takeshiy aus
Still a great pair but not the best
I love the available size options and the pair I ordered were true to size. These are the 3rd revisions and I think the previous ones were of better quality and design. The green is not as dark as they look on the website.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-08-09
Rated 5 von
5
von
Newf2789 aus
Great Trousers!
Great trousers-well made.
Would prefer a more tapered leg and
I liked the zippered pockets of the previous iteration.
Overall good design.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-08-13
Rated 5 von
5
von
Larry Vanzant aus
Comfy
Was expecting a different pant. Fit perfect and super Comfortable!
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-06-17
Rated 5 von
5
von
Mack Khouri aus
Best product Rapha makes
The greatest product Rapha ever made. And this new tech trousers they’ve improved upon and it’s even better. It’s more durable and even more water resistant. There’s an extra pocket with a zipper and the pant’s front pockets are actual trouser pockets which allow me to wear the pants in more formal setting. Absolutely love these pants. I have 3 pairs.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-06-14
Rated 1 von
5
von
Drex aus
Nicht zu empfehlen.
Was soll ich sagen, ich liebe die Farbe. Aber der Stoff und der Schnitt sind wirklich nicht gut und viel zu weit. Mein Hosenbein landet öfter mal an/in der Kette. Die fehlenden Reisverschlüsse an den Taschen, weswegen ich die ersten Technical/Rand. Trousers gekauft habe, gibt es so nicht mehr. Geld und Telefon fliegen öfter mal raus, vor allem, wenn man sich mal kurz nach hinten lehnt oder auch zufälligerweise mal auf einer Couch liegt. Bitte wieder zurück zum alten Design. Auch mit schmaleren Beinen.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-08-15
Rated 4 von
5
von
Yules aus
Different than the originals but still awesome
Feels lighter and smoother than the original tech trousers, pockets are different and moved the reflector to the left side (Better for me as we ride on the right lane at Tel Aviv). Love them but they do feel like a step down from the previous model.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-12-28
Rated 5 von
5
von
aivo aus
Technical trousers, stone W32/34
I bought light ones for the summer, at first I doubted, but the material is good and does not get dirty easily and is easy to clean. Good everyday pants, versatile enough, a bit stretchy, the right length (32/34) and doesn't get dirty easily (read: easy to clean). I especially like the vertical zipped pocket, good phone access even when sitting. I also have the previous models, but these are the best replacement for jeans.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-09-02
Rated 2 von
5
von
Moritz M aus
Bring back the loopback trousers
Der Schnitt hat sich geändert, die Hose ist unten etwas weiter, der Schritt kürzer, der Bund nicht mehr elastisch. All dies trägt dazu bei, dass die Hose auf dem Rad weniger funktional und weniger komfortabel ist. Die fehlende RV Tasche hinten stört mich nicht, da ich dort auf dem Rad sowieso nichts drin habe. Die alte "Loopback trousers" war die beste. Bringt diese bitte zurück, ich würde sie sofort 2-3x bestellen.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-12-21
Rated 5 von
5
von
LachlanLA aus
Nice pants.
I'm 5ft10 85 kg. Got size 34W and 30L - good fit a bit tight at waist... found the sizing to be pretty consistent with other pants I own. Nice fit, good fabric. I never had the old version of these so am rating them as they stand not against a ghost. Have done some hikes in them, good for walking bit of stretch in the fabric, water doesn't seep in easily and dries quickly.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2024-02-07
Rated 3 von
5
von
Anonym aus
Good, but sizing options too limited.
Excellent finish and durable so far, but the choice of sizes isn't adequate for a population of fit, active cyclists. I'm far from the slimmest cyclist I know, but have to wear the smallest waist size available, 29". The longest trouser length available with this waist size is just slightly shorter than I would like. Many others must have similar problems.
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2023-07-17